Intent of Ingestion of Poisonous Substances in India

 

Thakur Amit K.1*, Sahu A.2 and John Masih1

1Assistant Professor, Medicine, Govt. Medical College, Jagdalpur (Bastar)

2Assistant Professor, Pediatrics, Govt. Medical College, Jagdalpur (Bastar) India

 

 

ABSTRACT:

History: The abuse of poisonous material is noted since long time.

Objective: to analysis the intention behind abuse of various compound in the community.

Material and methods: The study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital. 291 cases of both sexes and 11 and above years of age of poisoning who were brought to hospital for treatment taken as sample.

Variables: suicidal, accidental etc.

Statistical analysis: were expressed in simple terms of proportion

Findings: Most common intent of poisoning was noted suicidal followed by accidental. There were 12.72 % cases who didn’t disclose the intention behind the ingestion of poison.

 

KEYWORDS: Suicidal, Accidental

 

 

INTRODUCTION:

Susruta, 350 BC, described how the poison mixed with food and drink. Un-ointment oil ,perfumes ,medicine, bathing water, snuff or sprinkled over clothes ,shoes ,beds, jewellary or put in the eyes ,ears etc. Gradually these arises a class of professional poisonous who could ingeniously mask the bitter taste or strange odour of the poisons with sweet tasting and pleasant substances. Bhoj Prabhada,980 AD, has a reference to the inhalation of medicaments before surgical operations and an anesthetic called "Sammohini" is said to have been used in the time of Buddha, Reddy (1).The incidence of poisoning is rising in India and intent of these poisoning cases vary from case to case right from suicidal, accidental , undetermined etc.

 

Suicide: The registrar General of England, consider suicide as a type of accidental death eg. poisoning, gasing, strangulation etc.(2). Keeping in view the above and as per recommendations of the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) study group in 1957,that in order to get a comprehensive picture of a health problem / disease ,vital statistics is not sufficient ,more and more such studies  have to be conducted, Garg Narendra K.(3) and Garg Narendra K.and Sharma A.B.(4), the authors have under taken this study with the objective  to know the intention of the victim for this act which put the life of the same in danger.

 

MATERIAL AND METHOD:

The study was carried out in the S.S. Medical College and associated S.G.M. Hospital, Rewa (M.P.) between April 2003and April 2004. A total 291 cases of both sexes and 11 and above years of age group, who were admitted in emergency ward of the department of medicine ,taken as sample. A complete history was obtained from the patient or from his/her attendant if patient was not in position to tell all the details.


OBSERVATIONS AND DISCUSSION:

On analysis of the collecting data, it has been revealed that out of 291 cases 210 (72.16%) cases ingested poisoning with the intention of committing suicide, while 44 (15.12 %) disclosed that it was just accidental and the remaining 37 (12.72%) didn't disclose the intention because of one reason or the other ,the reason best known to them    (Table-I).

Table No.- I : Distribution of Cases according to Intent in Overall Poisoning n=291

S.no

Intent of Poisoning

No. of Cases

Percentage

1

Suicidal

210

72.16

2

Alleged Accidental

44

15.12

3

Not Disclosed

37

12.72

 Total

291

100.00

 

On further exploring the data as per poisonous material, it came to know that in case of aluminium phosphide (ALM) the suicidal rate was 86.21% in comparison to the 56.00% in Organo Phosphrous (O.P.) compound. On further analysis it was revealed that alleged accidental was higher (34.00%) in OP in comparison to 07.76% in ALP, while the proportion of those who didn't disclose the intention were more or less equal i.e.06.03 % in cases of ALP while 10.00% in O.P.(Table-II and III).

 

table- II-deaths due to poisoning in india (1992-94)

Nature of poisoning

Sex

1992

1993

1994

Accidental

M

7510

7903

8133

 

F

5263

5231

5619

 

Total

12773

13134

13752

Suicide

M

16406

17180

18784

 

F

11680

11562

12234

 

Total

28086

28742

31018

Others

M

3959

4318

4247

 

F

1960

2154

2273

 

Total

5919

6472

6520

Grand Total

 

46778

48348

51290

 

Siwach et al (5) reported 75.5% of cases with suicidal intent. In a study by Chugh et al (6) 70.6% cases were suicidal and rest 29.4% were accidental.  A study conducted by Aggrawal et al (7) also reported most common intent of poisoning as suicidal. Goel et al (1998) also reported majority (96.1%) with suicidal intent. Aggrawal et al (7) reported their data from Patna (1996) revealed accidental ingestion as the most common mode of poisoning in children 57.7% due to Kerosene, 10.2% miscellaneous, 8.5% unknown, 6.2% organophosphates, 3.5% rodenticides and other insecticide table-II.  

 

A detailed analysis of death due to poisoning in the year 1992, 93 and 94 shows that the most intent of poisoning is suicidal (table-II).Further in 1994 maximum number of death due to poisoning were reported from West Bengal, Aggrawal et al (7).

 

Poisoning was much more common in people with low socio-economic status.

 

TABLE-III: DEATHS DUE TO POISONING IN INDIA (1994; n= 51290)

State/UT

Accident

Suicide

Other

Total

West Bengal

2025

5474

750

8222

Maharashtra

2560

3736

865

7161

Tamilnadu

2064

3885

411

6360

Madhya Pradesh

1616

1714

1941

5271

Karnataka

1102

3510

500

5112

Andhra Pradesh

482

3137

370

3989

Kerala

94

3298

51

3441

Uttar Pradesh

975

1023

230

2228

Gujarat

459

1337

257

2053

Orissa

338

1065

450

1853

Rajasthan

641

629

110

1380

Delhi

86

164

24

274

 

TABLE-IV- POISONING IN ADULT DATA FROM CHANDIGARH (1970-79)

Socio

economic Status

Cause

Rural

Urban

Male

Female

Male

Female

Upper

(n = 29)

Accidental

02

02

01

01

Suicidal

12

09

-

-

Undetermined

02

-

-

-

Lower

(n = 283)

Accidental

29

09

30

05

Suicidal

87

50

42

05

Undetermined

07

-

-

-

 

The most common intent of poisoning was suicidal followed by accidental.  Over the next decade i.e. 1980 to 1989 Aluminium phosphide became the most commonly encountered agent in poisoning cases (31.35%) with an increase in mortality rate to 58%, Aggrawal et al(7), female ratio was nearly 2:1,Aggrawal et-al(7).  From above observations and discussion the authors reached to the conclusion that the findings of the present study and those of others are more or less similar in nature. 

 

CONCLUSION:

Most common intent of poisoning was noted suicidal while as per poisonous material there was higher proportion in cases of Aluminium phosphide in comparison to Organophosphorus this may be because of easy availability of the compounds.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The  authors expresses their sense of gratitude to Prof. A.K. Bansal, Ex- H.O.D., Department of Community Medicine, Late Baliram Kashyap Memorial Govt. Medical College, Jagdalpur (Bastar) 494 001, India, for his expert guidance in preparing this manuscript

 

REFERENCES:

(1)     Park J.E. Suicide ;Text book of Preventive and Social Medicine (A treatises of community health) 1st edition ;M/S. Banarsi Das Bhanot ,Jabalpur M.P. :449.

(2)     Reddy Naryan K.S. The essentials of forensic medicine and toxicology 2003; 408; 428-431; 434; 435 and 488-492.

(3)     Garg Narendra K.: Evaluation of the impact of emesis and emesis plus purgation Therapy; Research J Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics (2) March-April; 2010:201-202.

(4)     Garg Narendra K and Sharma A.B.: Epidemiological profile of patients attending a tertiary care hospital, Muktsar, Punjab (India); Research J Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics:3 (6) November-December;2011:311-317

(5)     Siwach SB, Yadav DR, Arora B, Dalal S. Acute aluminium phosphide poisoning ;an epidemiological ,clinical and histopathological study ;JAPI 1998:36:No.10;594-96

(6)     Chugh SN, Dushyant, Arora B et al .Incidence and outcome of patients of aluminium phosphide poisoning in a hospital study .IJMR 1991; 94:232-35

(7)     Aggarwal Praveen ,Handa Rohini, Wall J.P..Common poisoning in India; JFMT ,Vol.XV.N0.1:Jan.-June 1998 :73-79.

 

Received on 21.09.2012

Modified on 22.03.2013

Accepted on 12.04.2013

© A&V Publication all right reserved

Research J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 5(2): March–April 2013, 140-142